Asbestos Litigation Back in the News
Asbestos Litigation Back in the News
In a country that had been the world’s greatest consumer of asbestos, Professor Irving J. Selikoff established in the 1960s a link between the inhalation of asbestos particles and lung-related illnesses. He found that workers exposed to asbestos often had scarred lung tissue 30 years after exposure. Dr. Selikoff was a pioneer in environmental and occupational medicine, also responsible for having pressured the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to limit workplace exposure to asbestos. Starting with 2004, legislative bodies in some key jurisdictions began to enact medical criteria laws requiring asbestos claimants to present plausible and objective medical evidence of physical impairment in order to proceed with a claim. While other countries have addressed asbestos injuries through centralized benefits programs that combine costs and risks, the U.S. has relied heavily on litigation. Asbestos litigation is a type of toxic tort lawsuit, typically brought against manufacturers, distributors, and suppliers of asbestos-containing products and materials. By the early 2000s, an estimated 730,000 claims had been filed, targeting over 8,400 companies in 75 of 83 categories of economic activity within the U.S. economy.Now, asbestos litigation appears to be evolving once again. A trial court ordered Johnson & Johnson in the summer of 2018 to pay $4.69 billion to 22 women, who alleged that the company’s talc-based products contain asbestos, which can naturally occurs near talc, and caused them to develop ovarian cancer. In 2019, the world’s largest manufacturer of health-care products, including baby powders, is facing a considerable number of talc-related lawsuits nationwide. There are at least 21 trials on court calendars targeting Johnson & Johnson over tainted talc, including more than 15 in California’s courts and one in Georgia. Lawsuits are no longer the only concern for J&J, as the company’s stock dipped on after a woman in California, who claimed that asbestos found in its talc-based powder products had caused her to develop mesothelioma, was awarded $29 million by a jury on 14 March. J&J says it will appeal the judgment pointing to “serious procedural and evidentiary errors”. “Research, clinical evidence and nearly 40 years of studies by independent medical experts around the world continue to support the safety of talc. Talc does not cause cancer”, the healthcare company says.
Sign reading “DANGER: Contains Asbestos Fibers, Avoid Creating Dust. Lung disease and cancer hazard.” Image by Clker-Free-Vector-Images, via Pixabay.com.
Sources:
The issues surrounding asbestos will not go away15 AGs petitioned EPA to develop a new asbestos reporting rule that will protect the lives of thousands workers, families and children across the country
About Gregory A. Cade
Gregory A. Cade is a dedicated attorney with over 20 years of legal experience. Gregory Cade – the owner of Environmental Litigation Group, P.C., is a committed lawyer with a scientific background in Industrial Hygiene, and a real drive to handle cases at a professional level. His work consists in representing injured victims and their families with the purpose of obtaining substantial recoveries.