Can a Motorcyclist be Liable for a Crash if They Hit Your Car?
Can a Motorcyclist be Liable for a Crash if They Hit Your Car?
A collision between a traditional motor vehicle and a motorcycle rarely ends well for the biker. Without the frame of a car around them to absorb some measure of the impact, the motorcyclist is directly exposed to an incredible and abrupt amount of force. A biker is at high risk of being thrown from their bike, which can cause serious and life-threatening injuries. In many cases, the driver of the car is found to be responsible for the crash, particularly if they were driving carelessly. However, you may be wondering what would happen if a motorcyclist crashed into a car. Perhaps the biker is trying to split lanes on the freeway and accidentally merges into a vehicle traveling next to them or they rear-end a vehicle stopped at a red light. Would the driver still be responsible for the collision? In this article, we discuss how liability is determined in motorcycle crashes and whether the biker may be responsible for a wreck. What Factors Contribute to Motorcycle Accidents?Motorcycle crashes can occur for many reasons, from operator errors to environmental factors. In general, most of the factors capable of causing a single or multi-vehicle crash can also lead to a motorcycle wreck. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, some potential crash factors can include:
Speeding
Distracted or impaired driving
Driving on the wrong side of the road
Improper turns
Tailgating
Violation of traffic signals or stop signs
Vehicle malfunction
Poor weather or road conditions
Violation of right-of-way rules
Reckless or aggressive driving and road rage
Unsafe lane splitting, or lane splitting in a state where it is not permitted
Biking under the influence
Biking while distracted
Reckless speeding
Pure comparative negligence: A plaintiff may claim a degree of damages even if they are as much as 99% at fault for their accident. Approximately one-third of states follow this rule at the time of this article’s writing.
Modified comparative negligence: There are two different types of modified comparative negligence. Under the “50% bar rule,” a recovery may not be made when the plaintiff is 50% at fault or higher. If a state uses a “51% bar rule,” a recovery may not be made by someone that is 51% or more responsible for the incident.
In an at-fault state, the motorist(s) who are liable for an accident are responsible for providing damages to the injured parties. Depending on the at-fault person’s financial situation, this may be accomplished through an insurance claim or out-of-pocket payment. In most cases, when an insurance claim is used to cover damages, it comes out of the liable motorist’s bodily injury liability coverage.
If you live in a no-fault state, each person involved in a collision is compensated through their own insurance policy, regardless of who was responsible for the crash. Usually, damage payouts are covered by the driver’s personal injury protection policy. In some cases where the crash victim suffers substantial injuries or property damage, it may be possible to pursue an injury lawsuit against the liable motorist.
At-Fault and No-Fault states; table by author.
About Jake Sanborn
Jake graduated from the University of San Diego with a bachelor's degree in English and Political Science. When he's not putting together a legal article or analytical piece, you can find him enjoying a nice hike or camping in the Laguna Mountains with friends.