Categories | News & Politics
Article
Historic Win! District Court Judge Blocks Doctors Censorship Law in California
February 21st, 2024
•
News & Politics
•
4 minute read
Historic Win! District Court Judge Blocks Doctors Censorship Law in California
Sacramento, CA — Senior Judge William Shubb of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California granted a preliminary injunction in Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) motion, halting Gov. Gavin Newsom, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and California Medical and Osteopathic Boards’ enforcement of California’s COVID-19 misinformation law.The judge found that the “plaintiffs have established a likelihood of success on the grounds of their Fourteenth Amendment vagueness challenges.”Rick Jaffe and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. are lead attorneys on the case representing plaintiffs Physicians for Informed Consent, LeTrinh Hoang, D.O. and CHD-California Chapter members.Judge Shubb’s order routinely cites Dr. Sanjay Verma's declaration that “explains in detail how the so-called ‘consensus’ has developed and shifted, often within mere months, throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.”Judge Shubb’s memorandum and order states, “drawing a line between what is true and what is settled by scientific consensus is difficult, if not impossible.” The judge explains, “because COVID-19 is such a new and evolving area of scientific study, it may be hard to determine which scientific conclusions are ‘false’ at a given point in time.”“The judge's ruling confirms an important right to share and receive truthful information involving important medical decisions,” said CHD’s Chairman and Chief Litigation Counsel Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “Promoting health, particularly children's health, must come before all other interests.”Mary Holland, president and general counsel of CHD, applauded the decision. She said, “This is not only a victory for California doctors, but for professionals and citizens around the world in this battle for freedom. The right to share and receive truthful information, no matter how uncomfortable it may be for those currently in power, must remain inviolate.”The order’s criticism of the new law is most remarkable: “Because the term ‘scientific consensus’ is so ill-defined, physician plaintiffs are unable to determine if their intended conduct contradicts the scientific consensus, and accordingly ‘what is prohibited by the law.’
Confused woman; image by Uday Mittal, via Unsplash.com.
About Press Release
This post is an authorized copy of a press release and was not written by LegalReader.