GOP Bill Would Get Rid of Micro-Unions
GOP Bill Would Get Rid of Micro-Unions
As the single mother of an only child, my mom used to joke that she stopped after one kid because she didn't want to be outnumbered. It's funny because although the power differential between adults and children is considerable, good parents aren't generally worried that their kids will team up to harm them. Not every hierarchical relationship is as benevolent, though, especially out in the corporate world where profit is king. When job openings are plentiful and workers in short supply, empowered employees can more effectively stand up for their interests. However, when opportunities are scarce and workers are desperate, the natural power differential between the owners of jobs and the people that need them is magnified. That's why the renewed Republican effort to scuttle the ability of workers to organize in micro-unions is ill-timed and mean-spirited.In 2011, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled in its Specialty Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center of Mobile decision that contrary to previous decisions, small groups of workers in the health care sector could organize and form micro-unions within a single facility. Traditionally, bargaining units were held to represent “all workers in a given class or craft,” such as the employees of a single factory, or all the workers of a certain kind (say, janitors) across several locations in a company. The new ruling meant that smaller, non-majority groups of employees could unionize, such as certified nursing assistants at a nursing home facility, without consulting with the other employees.While the NLRB assured legislators and employers that the ruling was meant to cover only workers in the non-emergency healthcare industry, the Mobile decision is the basis of the spread of micro-unions across many sectors in recent years.Certainly, micro-unions have their flaws. They can create competition between departments in a single business, and make negotiations between employers and workers harder than dealing with a single union. (However, wouldn't negotiations with a handful of micro-unions be easier than dealing with, say, a hundred individuals?) For their part, businesses seem to be worried that allowing micro-unions will make it easier for organized labor to gain a foothold, while simultaneously worrying that micro-unions won't adequately represent every employee. Are they concerned about fair representation, or not?
A pro-union protester holds signs at the Rally to Save the American Dream in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in 2011, the same year that the NLRB allowed micro-unions. Photo by Fibonacci Blue, via Flickr. CC BY 2.0
Sources:
Republicans introduce bill to scrap micro-unions
Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Mobile: Board Decision
Micro-Unions Are Target of Reintroduced GOP Legislation
NLRB's Micro-Union Ruling Hurts Workers
Eliminate 'Micro Unions' and Restore Appropriate Bargaining Units
Is the U.S. labor market finally at full employment? Not according to the inflation numbers.
9 Years After Recession Began, Some States Still Unrecovered
It Looks Like Donald Trump Did Really Well With Union Households. That’s A Bad Sign For Unions.
Business groups alarmed by rise of micro-unions in workplace
Definitions for Common Labor Terms
About Dawn Allen
Dawn Allen is a freelance writer and editor who is passionate about sustainability, political economy, gardening, traditional craftwork, and simple living. She and her husband are currently renovating a rural homestead in southeastern Michigan.