Types of Prosecutorial Misconduct in Jackson, Mississippi
Types of Prosecutorial Misconduct in Jackson, Mississippi
Prosecutors must take care not to break the law in Jackson, Mississippi. Even though these individuals are responsible for holding criminals accountable for their actions, they cannot become criminals themselves in the process. As Frederich Nietzsche once said: “Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster.” If you’re facing criminal charges in Mississippi, it’s important to keep a watchful eye on the conduct of prosecutors. If they engage in prosecutorial misconduct, you can make sure that they experience consequences. This may also lead to greater success with your criminal case. If you are facing criminal charges, you should get in touch with a qualified, experienced criminal defense attorney in Mississippi as soon as possible. These legal professionals will fight for your rights in an effective, confident manner. The sooner you team up with an attorney, the better your chances will become of a positive outcome. Prosecutorial Misconduct is Relatively CommonProsecutors are just as human as the rest of us, and they have a tendency to engage in misconduct. This is probably because generally speaking, a prosecutor is much less likely to experience consequences for these actions compared to a criminal defense attorney. A 2003 report suggests that decisions in over 2,000 cases since 1970 have been reversed, reduced, or dismissed due to prosecutorial misconduct. Only 44 of these prosecutors were disciplined. Types of Prosecutorial Misconduct
Image by Immo Wegmann, via Unsplash.com.
Burden Shifting: The burden of proof is always on the prosecutor, as you are “innocent until proven guilty.” Burden shifting is when the prosecutor attempts to make you responsible for proving your own innocence.
Failure to Disclose Evidence: Prosecutors can get in a lot of trouble for failing to disclose certain evidence, especially in the context of exculpatory evidence. This is evidence that is favorable to the defendant in some way.
Falsified Evidence: Falsified evidence is obviously not allowed. An example might be a gun or a bag of drugs “planted” on a defendant. In addition, evidence that is obtained illegally is not admissible in court.
Tainting the Jury: A jury is said to be “tainted” when it becomes biased in some way. A prosecutor might taint the jury by exposing them to inaccurate, exaggerated, or unsupported statements.
About Peter Charles
Having graduated from Saint John’s University in 1993, Peter Charles, Chief Operating Officer, brings a dynamic 28-year sales career reflecting pioneering experience and record-breaking performance in the computer and internet industries. He remains on the industry’s cutting-edge, driving new business through key accounts and establishing strategic partnerships and dealer relationships to increase channel revenue. He is currently focused on providing multiple revenue streams for USAttorneys.com. He can be reached at 800-672-3103.